Jarrod M.

Results 13 comments of Jarrod M.

So same CLI, and it would re-build the relevant source files if necessary - like how `zig build` works. Nice!

You might also get away with just handling it with the command handler ESL and the various browser classes. I believe there is a base browser class? And they are...

Have it send without a target, pvNil. The browser/easel should pick it up since the command accepts fcmmNobody. But still need to figure out edge cases where there would be...

Ah, so the browsers never receive the commands because they are never being added the Command Execution list. So the only way currently they are able to handle them is...

> Is `fcmmNobody` for Handlers that handle all events? It means it handles those events that have no target, specifically pvNil. And fcmmOthers means it handles those that **do have**...

Yeah, that’s the idea is to have a manager built-in.

Related: https://github.com/jayrod246/kauai/issues/2

I placed this code [at line 466](https://github.com/ziglang/zig/blob/54e48f7b7dec96c8cdd1a0a0491554b118767817/lib/std/Build/Watch.zig#L466) in Watch.zig: ```zig for (files.items) |basename| { const tmp = try path.joinString(gpa, basename); defer gpa.free(tmp); path.access(basename, .{}) catch { std.debug.print("\n*****************\nFILE MISSING: {s}\n*****************\n", .{tmp});...

This might have more to do with #20631 as I noticed we are attempting to watch directories inside `.zig-cache/o/`. `test.exe` is an artifact, which Watch.zig is attempting to track. But...

`windows.kernel32.ReadDirectoryChangesW` is recently removed in #19641 Thoughts on where or how I can reintroduce it? Or if there is an Nt way it can be replicated?