Jay Phelps

@BurtHarris forgive my ignorance: is this still an issue after #133?

@BurtHarris I'm OK with deprecating and removing lazyInitialize tbh. I'm doubtful any sizable number of people use it and now that we're dropping the debounce, etc I don't think we...

@BurtHarris are you a big user of lazyInitialize?

@BurtHarris it's still up in the air, but I find it unlikely both decorators and class fields will ship without interop between them. TC39 is still attempting to solidify these...

Sorry for the delay, making my way through a huge backlog. I'm not sure why that happens. Does any of the other imports work? If you're using the ESM build...

> I don't see that in exported list either. Can you clarify? it shows up here: https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/es/core-decorators.js

> Yes, sorry for the size of the PR @jayphelps. No need to apologize, by its nature it has to be huge--but I appreciate it. > If you want to...

You should have permissions to create new labels and then add them to any tickets, if not lmk. That won't truly prevent you or I from merging it though. I've...

Travis is reporting success because `gulp test` returned exit status 0, indicating success by POSIX convention. I'm not immediately familiar with gulp enough to know how to bubble up a...

Unfortunately we may have jumped the gun here. Babel is actively working on [adding support for stage-2 decorators](https://github.com/babel/proposals/issues/11) and when they do, I think core-decorators needs to follow suit. AFAIK...