Jay Gilmore

> It may take me a few weeks but is on the list. Hey @Mark-H any chance you might be able to take another peek at this one, since you...

I'm totally in favour of removing Sass as well. I'd like to learn more about how the postCSS would work for indididual contributors having not used it recently.

@SnowCreative > why not keep the grayed-out versions for published & hidden ones? That gives an extra visual cue beyond just the italic text. This is a fair point. @rthrash...

> @jaygilmore Jay - giving you a little bump here. Did you get a chance to take a look at the solution in the file I attached? I'm going to...

@smg6511 I started looking at your file and comparing mine. I can't see any difference in the results. Font weights are ignored if unsupported by the font and the next...

@smg6511 I'll take another look. This is really strange that the icons are not showing at the lower weights—unless the font supports the lower weight and we just didn't include...

@smg6511 I figured it out, indeed, it's Chrome not behaving as Safari. The spec for fonts (including any glyph) is to match the weight with the next available weight and...

@smg6511, I've reviewed your changes, and they seem mostly alright in practice but they do not take into consideration the `.fa-folder` use to define a custom icon for a Template....

@smg6511 I've added the full list of the FA5 Free icons that support the regular (outlined) in the file. Did you want to check to make sure it makes sense...