jayashree15
jayashree15
Hi Colin, You were right. Once I corrected the values in acqparams.txt, the issue went away. Thank you for your help! Jayashree
Hi Colin, I've another question about the b0 output from the docker. As you can see in the below screenshots, the output b0 images (both original and undistorted) are blurred...
It is 1.5mm iso, acquired at 3T.
Hi Johannes, I followed the github-synb0-readme because I do not have reverse PE direction diffusion images. The synthetic b0 that is generated by the docker from the input b0 and...
> This matches some of the data we used to test the generalizability of the model, so I don't think you should have any issues. Thanks for confirming, Colin! Jayashree
Hi Colin, I tried to do topup as a part of the synb0 and also outside the script (including more b0) to test the topup results. I observed the following,...
Hi Colin, Yes, you understood the comparison correctly. The FSL version I use to run topup is 6.0.3. Does that match with the container's FSL version? I did the comparison...
Hi Colin, Now that I've used this pipeline to correct for distortion, I wanted to do a preliminary analysis comparing the single and two PE direction scans through a parameter...
So, if I have the mean FA values for a particular region of interests for two image datasets, then can I calculate the MSE between the mean values? Thanks, Jayashree