javadevmtl

So I tested this on my own handler with the suggestion of using `ctx.addEndHandler()` 1- `ctx.addBodyEndhanlder()` fires only after success of `ctx.response().end()` this allows to create true "filter" style handler....

Hi, so just to be sure 2 things will happen 1- A function like parameterName() or similar will be added. 2- The error message will contain the field name.

Hi here is a sample stack trace. But I don't think you should only rely on 1-2 stack traces that I provided below. I also provided a sample code of...

I guess this is still ongoing? I just tried 4.2.4 and still no field name is provided. It just tells us that there's a string somewhere wrong on the Json....

@vietj Do you foresee this being fixed any time soon?

Any update on this? I can't be the only one who needs this? lol

Yeah, I can't migrate from 3.9.X to 4 because of this. I'm I the only one who actually returns the field name as part of my error messages to the...

+1 I had similar situation here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/vertx/javadevmtl%7Csort:relevance/vertx/sPqBE79tx2U/EAkRgfhqEgAJ Each user gets their own unique eventbus address. So even if you have common address like com.xxx.chat you also can have com.xxx.chat,user1-abcd, this...

Hi any news on this? I would really like to migrate from 3.9.x to 4.x

Hi thats fine we already had to make changes to go from 3.x to 4.x Open-Api. This is why we opened this bug because the older 4.x changes removed "functionality"....