Joris Baum

@bwillard I would also love to understand how a service such as Solid could be used via API. AFAIK it is one of the few adapters that requires a different...

Thanks for the quick reply! I just checked for my own understanding. The POM file I linked contains: ``` https://projects.eclipse.org/license/epl-2.0 ``` While the [current algorithm](https://github.com/spdx/spdx-maven-plugin/blob/fbada9e27fbbec6024ce48166cf3c85906d59b18/src/main/resources/resources/licenses.json#L1570) expects: * https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0 or *...

> if so, this should be fine The problem is that I tried it with and without the `crossReference` and both times it still shows "NOASSERTION" for jakarta.json/jakarta.json-api . Do...

> You could add a licenseDeclared configuration parameter for the package that references LicenseRef-epl-workaround Sadly I am unable to find out how to do that. There does not seem to...

> The [licenseConcluded](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-maven-plugin/createSPDX-mojo.html#licenseConcluded) configuration parameter should allow you to define a license expression where you should be able to use the licenseRef. Mhh.. I do not understand how to add...

Thanks! That clarifies things. > create a pull request for the [license XML for the Eclipse Public License](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/src/EPL-2.0.xml) to add the additional URL reference. It would take a couple of...

> For the additional cases you mentioned above, do you see any reliable means of determining the license from the POM files? Maybe: * for [eclipse/parsson 1.1.1](https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/parsson/parsson/1.1.1/parsson-1.1.1.pom) look if there...