Jarek

Omarchy uses systemd-networkd + iwd by design. This is a deliberate architectural choice for simplicity and minimal dependencies. NetworkManager would: - Add unnecessary complexity - Conflict with existing systemd-networkd configuration...

Hey folks, I've been following both of these PRs and I still don't see a compelling reason why we should adopt NetworkManager in Omarchy. Obviously this isn't just my call...

Thanks for the responses, but honestly, they prove my point better than I ever could. @kromsam You threw around buzzwords like "Swiss Army Knife" and "hassle-free experience," but completely failed...

@reppiz Fair question. NetworkManager adds ~3.5MB binary plus dependencies (dnsmasq, plugins), runs multiple daemons, requires D-Bus, and sits as an abstraction layer on top of iwd/wpa_supplicant anyway. In the oposite...