Ján Ondrušek

Results 15 comments of Ján Ondrušek

> Right now when creating a jail with both a local ipv4 and ipv6 address I am curious about your setup. Are you using private ipv4 on vnet and public...

> I tried to get things in order here, but this repo didn't get as much love as mod_pagespeed @oschaaf, is there anything specific that needs to be sorted out?...

You can find details about work required to support FreeBSD in #308 and current tracking apache/incubator-pagespeed-mod#1073. I do not know of a good alternative, that runs directly in your local...

Unfortunately the https://github.com/mmokhi/mod_pagespeed is out of sync with [www/mod_pagespeed Port](https://www.freshports.org/www/mod_pagespeed/). Moreover, the Port got deleted on 2020-09-19 and was marked broken Aug 2020.

Hi @GorNishanov! There was a proposal to enhance `async_mutex` in #387. Would the proposed pattern with sender algorithms suite your use case?

@bsdgox sorry for a late response, we are planning to invest more time into maintenance of the library. Here is an updated example: https://godbolt.org/z/3eEoWbE7o 1. I used clang 14 (trunk...

https://github.com/facebookexperimental/libunifex/blob/main/doc/concepts.md#streams > Note that if next() is called then it is not permitted to call next() again until that sender is either destroyed or has been started and produced a...

It seems that you would need to build a _queue_ (or as you previously mentioned an `async_buffer`). Consumer would then poll the _async_ queue and the producer store results in...

@lewissbaker is [currentThreadContext](https://github.com/facebookexperimental/libunifex/blob/8069b11344a3aa0515748c6b14819d90d5166fe3/source/linux/io_uring_context.cpp#L276) what you meant?

@lewissbaker is this OK to close? Seems like `via()` was addressed in PR #273.