Jan Wassenberg

> the incremental work is basically 1 line of config Nice and efficient :) > I'll probably only be able to check Intel AVX2 and below and ARM NEON with...

Thanks for sharing. On licensing, I understand the difficulty of asking all contributors. We have done this in the past, but it takes some time. Under these circumstances, I think...

Hi @GoodDaisy , are you able to sign the [CLA](https://cla.developers.google.com/)?

:) Is it possible that the CLA has been signed by a different email address than the one used in this PR (r***z​@consenlabs.com)?

Hi @GoodDaisy, sorry to reply late. Is it possible to re-push or recreate the pull request using the other email address that already has the CLA? Alternatively, are you able...

It is fixed, thanks :)

Nice, I understand we want to compile with differing compile flags. This makes sense for MSVC; one could argue that clang/gcc supersede MSVC even on Windows, but certainly MSVC is...

Hi @Pflugshaupt , we differentiate between HWY_COMPILER_MSVC and HWY_COMPILER_CLANGCL. I believe runtime dispatch would work with the latter, independently of whether invoked via Visual Studio or not.

hm, the "requires target feature" usually means we are missing a pragma. It is important for all of your SIMD-using code to be between HWY_BEFORE_NAMESPACE/HWY_AFTER_NAMESPACE: these set up a pragma...

Nice, glad to hear that was it :)