jamshale
jamshale
Need to look at the failing scenario test. Thought it was working.
This is because of the anoncreds revocation algorithm. The 0th index is reserved. It's caused a lot of confusion. It's different from the legacy indy implementation because it it uses...
I'm having a lot of trouble with github actions and this scenario test. I'm going to get a separate PR open for only the fix to move this forward when...
There's going to be an update to the spec so I'm not going to work on this until it gets approved and the library gets updated.
OK. Sounds good. I can continue on this. I'm kind of blocked by bot getting it published. There's a pr in trustdidweb-py repo to do it but hasn't got completed...
Maybe that does make sense. After verifying and resolving the did it could get the response from the endpoint and return that. The way it is now, that responsibility would...
@PatStLouis The library does the verification. I haven't gone over the spec with the code in detail, but basic testing seemed to be correct.
Removed the did url usage in the resolver. I think a did url dereference ticket should be created next as a separate task. Maybe with a similar pattern to the...
Also, I forgot to mention that the ruff linting based on the rules in `pyproject.toml` weren't actually being checked by the github action pipelines. This fixes that issues now and...
@amanji @dbluhm Do you have any insight into this issue? I don't really have an interop setup atm, to look into this better. I'm not entirely sure what settings is...