James Synge
James Synge
According Kevin @ iOptron, if we **do not** send the "set lat-long" commands to an iOptron mount, it will discover its location on its own. The implication of our conversation...
We now have a testing infrastructure for simulating serial devices (see `pocs/tests/serial_handlers` and `pocs/tests/test_rs232.py`). We should build a minimal handler of the iOptron mount protocol, and use it to test...
I propose that the targets info should be available without any priority info, but with info that can be used to make decisions. For example, instead of having a priority...
Just as we support reading from pocs_local.yaml, it would be nice if we could read from a local variant of the fields file. Alternately, if we could specify *additional* field...
We have a fan in the computer box, but don't automatically turn it on or off, but we really should make better use of that hardware. We have temp sensors...