James Haydon

I am also working on a project which would need custom extensions to Duckling. @patapizza do you have any ideas of how this will work yet? Even maybe an ETA?...

@patapizza In our project we combine Duckling with a Natural Language parser. Our requirements are similar to those from @alph486, with respect to Time. We want to add new attributes...

Hi @kenokenobingo , thanks for reporting this, we'll be looking into it soon.

Hi @kenokenobingo , are you still experiencing problems with this? I believe the main cause for this may have been fixed in previous PRs.

It would be great to choose a canonical format not associated with Generic encoding of Haskell types, since we already want to change this.

Looks great!

I think it would be nice but: - There are still occasions where one might want to sequence some things without creating a new scope (e.g. `(if foo (do (load!...

Hi @maxhallinan No this poorly worded issues was actually about pattern-matching. The functionality you describe is currently implemented in `lookup-default`: https://github.com/radicle-dev/radicle/blob/master/rad/prelude/dict.rad#L61 although it might be better to make `lookup-maybe` a...

> A reasonable semantics for the first approach might be something like mappend, where a nil value is treated as the identity value of that type. In other words, the...

@jkarni Yes the fact that list/vector binding was "total" and the dict binding "partial" was something that irked my from the start. I still think partial-matching will be the most...