James Nesbitt

@stof that does sound like a risk. Do you think there is any risk to assetic if large frameworks like Laravel are moving to 4.0. Does Travis run enough testing...

@stof, I will ask my colleague to submit a PR with just the symfony/process change, just to get some more opinions. It is clear for me that this is not...

just saw this: https://github.com/kriswallsmith/assetic/pull/880

@stof What is your ambition with #880? Wil l you try to get it in as a version update, if the PR gets up to snuff?

this is in ambition a duplicate of https://github.com/kriswallsmith/assetic/pull/880 #880 is farther ahead in terms of repercusions of updating symfony/process

#880 includes the dropping of 5.3 support. Not sure if this is needed.

This would also make the diff more usable in various CI scenarios

OK, so I am not using Ubuntu, but here are some instructions on how I got this to build on Linux. A quick warning is that it ain't pretty. First...

0.15.2 and 1.0.0 are probably more important targets at this time.

RE: persistant data: consider snapshotting dbs by "docker commit" to a new image tag? images are exportable and distributable, but commited images are big. Requires that you don't use "VOLUME...