Jan Åge Lavik

Indeed this should be well possible via the websearch admin, so I see no reason to keep this code.

@kaplun almost! There is no automatic merging yet on the Labs harvesting like todays simplified merging on legacy. Plus the automatic acceptance of CORE record categories need to be added....

@kaplun Yeah, post AB if we deploy Labs on v3, we can see if the merger is already integrated and it can be turned off on production.

I mean that arXiv harvesting turns _off_ on production, but fully _on_ on labs

@fschwenn You are right. Not all of them are 100% completed yet, but at least it exists and produces some metadata and has an integration with the source, which is...

ping @jmartinm we should review this.

@GiorgosPa Can you rebase this and remove/comment out the added entries in rules.cfg (to avoid activating the rules on PROD). Then I will merge this.

Yeah, @GiorgosPa and I had a quick chat about this yesterday and we agreed to kill the KB and config variable parts actually. Instead turn it into a batch rule...

That said.. for the generic case, maybe a stable author typos mapping in a KB would make sense, but indeed the check should not worry about creating and filling the...

@kaplun Do you think this one is okay to merge?