Jake Lishman

I put some more download and versioning badges into the README in #1511. If you're happy Nathan (@nathanshammah) we can close this issue now?

Very probably. The integrator doesn't know what you're trying to achieve, and you've set it exact tolerance limits (either implicitly or explicitly), so it has to integrate within those limits....

I am reasonably sure that this is the same cause as #1160, and I'll just put the info I have now over there to keep it in one place.

_**edit to put the positivity up top!**_: This is a very exciting prospect to me, and I'm always happy when other libraries want to interact with QuTiP! In the interests...

Oh, one thing that I'd like to suggest we _don't_ do: use this interface to _implicitly_ create `Qobj` inside our functions. `__array__` was also originally meant as a method for...

Anything we do will be made on the `dev.major` branch, where the constructor is _much_ simpler and easier to work with, which hopefully should make things rather easier for you....

By the way, if you're organising your next major release right now, I wouldn't wait for us before you release it - we certainly won't define any interface until at...

I'm sorry I don't have a huge amount of time at the moment, but just to add an extra point (that it looks like I didn't think about before): if...

What do you mean by them being down - are you getting email bounces? Can you post any error?

It's because you want the expression `\exp(-i \beta X)`, but the RX gate is defined as `RX(\theta) = \exp(-i \theta X / 2)` (and similar for ZZ) both in the...