Jake Lishman

If you're concerned about the solvers, a) they skip tidyup til the end anyway and b) _technically_ the computational complexity of CSR * dense vector is identical to tidyup (though...

I think you might be able to achieve a lot of what you want already. The pseudo-code looks like it's not using `mesolve` super efficiently, though maybe it's only because...

Oh, also, about callback functions and `yield`: if we did this, the patterns for making `mesolve` re-entrant and forwards-compatible without hamstringing our ability to extend the APIs in the future...

I also note that I'm not replying to the thread I thought I was - I thought I was in `krotov`! For my response to the discussion points: - I...

@Ericgig: (about package organisation) sure, sounds like a good idea. I'll add a section when I've got some time. @nathanshammah: Happy to merge it in anywhere, but I've not done...

See also #1248

I'll try and have a look in the coming weeks - hopefully it's not too urgent or someone else could take it. I suspect looking over the whole module will...

See #1248 that implements the correct `A`. I'm not certain about the comment about `c_ops` - I'll need to look into it more before we merge #1248.

I think `hypothesis` is the best method here in the long term, but it will most likely have to be a long-term goal. I think the main pro in favour...

I now see SNOT and Toffoli gates as available in the gate resolvers, but I don't use the code so can't make a final judgment. I'll leave to @BoxiLi to...