Jake Lang

Note: testing the raw EEI methods would require a dummy implementation of each, or more sophisticated testing.

@axic I think that EEI as a trait doesn't make sense. I would bottle it up into a module so that it can still be isolated in its own namespace,...

@axic I want #6 to be merged before this is implemented, to avoid nasty diffs and merge conflicts.

I don't think we need it necessarily, this is probably outdated since you guys have worked in the same direction on this further than I have.

Needs to be rebased.

@axic do you want to build on this? or just rewrite the PR

@Keats any decision re: #1787?

@jwasinger ewasm/c-libeth would probably not be used for this case. the repo this issue is on serves that purpose, AFAIK.

Are you sure? As of a week ago, I am almost certain that I successfully built on stable. On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 13:39 Alex Beregszaszi *@axic* commented on this...

IIRC this is only to remove functions transitively called by the panicking infrastructure, which doesn't matter in the case of ewasm contracts. On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 13:59 Alex Beregszaszi...