Jacob Gilbert
Jacob Gilbert
Thanks @gmabey I agree there is a problem here. The N/N.sigmf-* structure was very much intentional. @bhilburn I do not have a strong opinion on this. The gist is this:...
The first option is a breaking change for applications that make assumptions based on the specifications guarantee. So while this is a possible resolution it is "bad" in the sense...
Ok, thanks for the context. I'll talk w/ Crane and see if I can get some info. If a good faith effort here fails I'll press along with deprecation on...
@bhilburn collections support is ready for libsigmf, but it needs this specification change - can you take a look and provide thoughts?
Can you help me understand when this would be used?
Your frustration is noted and not unreasonable but please keep in mind that this effort's goals of defining and maintaining a specification that is widely used in operational systems is...
it is very unlikely there will be added top level keys (see the discussion on #218), but I believe I understand what you are doing here now. This will probably...
Yes, archives can also have multiple Recordings (and collection files), though the tooling is a bit behind on this. I would still change the name to reflect that this dictionary...
@777arc I had asked @gmabey to split these out into separate requests since they are unrelated. Should be able to work through separating these things when its merge time.
@gmabey in order to make this reviewable we really need to remove things that are not related to the untarless operation. Can you please cherry-pick the appropriate commits onto a...