jackofallops

Results 36 comments of jackofallops

Hi @harshavmb - Thanks for this PR. This block has been deprecated due to a circular reference problem and replaced with a new resource `azurerm_container_app_custom_domain`. We're investigating the support of...

Hi @adamyager - This isn't in scope for the service rewrite currently as we don't support provisioning Functions (within a Function App / Static Web App) at this time (which...

Thanks for the feedback @adamyager - apologies if my reply came across a little terse, that wasn't the intention 🙈 Apparently I missed the GA on the BYOF feature, I...

Hi All :wave: We’re still looking to support this functionality, however we require acceptance tests for each resource that the Azure Provider supports and due to the way that the...

Tests passing: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb0ce8ab-ca86-49a1-a361-b58883a4c8c8)

> @tombuildsstuff Thanks for the comment, adding the empty check for this property. Tests are fine: ![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/92154856/332628724-70d2626b-dab9-4c26-81d1-6ce63f226d73.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Ky32iI0W3TtYhBShparAfWdG73UX24aSChHVAwbw1yQ) Hi @xiaxyi - Can you take a look at optimising the test config,...

> @jackofallops The PR is rebased on your latest changes to the eventhub test cases. Would you mind taking a look? Thanks Hi @xiaxyi - Looks like there's another error...

*bump* - Is someone available to triage and respond to this? This apparent breaking change is blocking feature adoption and development in the Terraform AzureAD provider.

Thanks for the reply @baywet. Our ingestion of the data expects a 2-part path for the tags, as seems to be the standard for every other tag in the spec....

Apologies for missing this one, this was closed by https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/pull/29871 ```bash export ARM_MSI_API_VERSION="2019-08-01" # optional, defaults to 2018-02-01. Some Azure services require a newer API version due to local implementation...