Jacqueline Firth
Jacqueline Firth
@rfindler Greatly, I think. Making the guide show how to use syntax parameters for the common use case and then showing the more general syntax-parameterize equivalent form would help readability...
You're on :)
@samth These test failures confound me. Any idea what's going on here? ``` -------------------- Typechecker tests > tc-expr tests > 652 (case-lambda: (((a : Number) (b : Number)) (+ a...
Does the `sequence/c` combinator face similar issues surrounding subtype preservation? Do we want `dict/c`'s handling of those issues to be consistent with `sequence/c`?
Should `sequence/c` do that too? (Which would be a totally separate pull request.)
Not supporting chaperone contracts is too bad, but I think it's better than the alternative of adding a whole new interface that implementations need to extend just to support contracts.
Hmm. Is there a way for `define-deprecated-alias` to raise an error if the target is unbound in the surrounding module or definition context _and_ not require the target be bound...
Is there any way to achieve the same thing in an internal definition context?
I drafted racket/racket#5289 to clarify what I'd like to work. I think `syntax-local-lift-module-end-declaration` will work correctly for the test cases I wrote, but I haven't tried it yet.
@mflatt @rfindler I just tried the "Configure Command Line for Racket" option in DrRacket 8.0 on macOS, and it did set the PATH for `racket` and `raco`... but not for...