Jack Batzner

I'd love this as well!

@fabiocav, @v-bbalaiagar - Is this a valid workflow for upgrading an app from V3 to V4 function runtimes?

Are there any updates or help I can provide @v-bbalaiagar / @suwatch / @ruslany ?

> Edit: ok. So, read the documentation and set **WEBSITE_OVERRIDE_STICKY_EXTENSION_VERSIONS=0** in _both slots_ and it works as advertised, nothing to see here move along. We ended up testing this out...

> @jackbatzner For step one, I think that kinda defeat the purpose of zero-downtime upgrade - if you change any setting on the production slot, it's going to restart. >...

> I was noticing exceptions being thrown in the production slot as a result, which means there could be some noticeable downtime in an application. I was able to confirm...

> Interesting. Presuming you have/had FUNCTIONS_EXTENSION_VERSION=~3 on the initial 'deployment' slot and 'production'? > > I'll have to specifically re-test when I get a chance. Correct @Froosh . On the...

> Let's duscuss further. I'm also interested in this type of "linting" process. I don't think it's possible during the compile time, but it may be possible during the runtime...

> I'm wondering if it would be possible to have less attributes.. possibly referencing something else so that you don't have just as many attribute lines as you have function...

This has been covered in the following PRs: #435 , #430 . Still awaiting review and comments from the repo owners, @justinyoo