Jaroslav Mracek

I think we will add that functionality to DNF5 project. DNF5 is going to replace microdnf (Fedora 38) and then DNF

I have a good news. The requested feature will be delivered with the next major Microdnf upgrade. The release is planned for Fedora 38 - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MajorUpgradeOfMicrodnf#User_Experience.

@sirredbeard @hugo-vrijswijk @Conan-Kudo It looks like a serious issue. Please could you open a bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/) with additional information about version of dnf, libdnf. Thanks a lot.

Because of worharround: ``` sudo rm -r /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock ``` I believe that the issue is in RPM. DNF never couch "/var/lib/rpm/" location with a default setting.

Thank you very much for the change proposal. with the proposal there are several questions that must be answered. 1. Is it a really good time and place to make...

If we will handle each group by a different set of rules then it will be tricky to provide general configuration that will modify the behavior for particular set of...

Anyway I have a great news. The functionality is nearly implemented in DNF5. DNF5 provides such an information about problems, hints during resolve() of requested operation reports in structure. Then...

@AdamWill When group install will be implemented (merged) in DNF5, I will ping you with kind request for tuning the interface and the behavior.

I would like to propose other mechanism that will allow to change default configuration for a particular downstream without modification of /etc/dnf/dnf.conf. I suggest that we need a configuration file...

> @j-mracek From my side, I have two major requirements: > > 1. Vendor shipped configuration for DNF that can be modified/overridden by users/admins > > 2. Vendor shipped repos...