Sam Isaacson

Also, the macro and `balance_reaction` should get proper doc strings showing their usage and discussing what they return.

I think it makes sense to have at the SciML level too (we can always say it is not required but recommended for the following reasons…).

https://github.com/SciML/Catalyst.jl/blob/bc8ebf0ade4713bd09e16e805193e5f69d640bc6/src/reactionsystem.jl#L568 It is just a kwarg to `ReactionSystem`, so a user is free to put equations in it. I think SBMLToolkit uses it, for example. I don't remember, however, if...

Probably better to make a new repo. Maybe CatalystNotebooks?

Generally our goal should be to maintain consistency with the conventions of MTK as much as possible. This makes it easier for Catalyst users to use MTK and vice-versa. Along...

5. We should allow higher derivatives and any other equation types MTK allows, so really we just want to assume users have typed a valid MTK equation, and then pass...

6. We should reuse as much as possible the `@equations` and other parsing code that has been put into MTK. This will make it easier for Catalyst to pickup any...

I thought so too, and definitely mentioned it, but somehow it was apparently missed.

I personally find the splitting of test files confusing, and can't ever find files now. It doesn't feel like we have so many src/*.jl files that this is needed yet...

I posted it on Discourse, but just for tracking purposes here is the simplest approach that works at the moment: ```julia using Catalyst, DifferentialEquations sir_model = @reaction_network begin β*t, S...