irisjae

Alright, the updated [runkit](https://runkit.com/irisjay/5a9250adfcf90c001236dd85) runs now! But you're right, it doesn't preserve the synchronity. Do you think it's possible to synchrously pipe the value of one top level data into...

@adamhaile I guess the thing I actually wanted to achieve when I asked this question was how to make a computation not be recomputed, something akin to `S(() => )`...

@fenduru Any news on how your approach is going? Interested to hear more

Ahh I see! Let me revert my project back to the S.subclock commit to take a look at what specifically caused the performance problems. I do think it was some...

If something that 'produces a node on demand' is needed, isn't it basically the same as this? ``` () => ``` To me, that's one of the clearer ways you...

The patch seems to work pretty well for my SVGs :D! Love your work, as usual! From my pedantic side... Though I'm only using custom attributes only on SVG, (which...

I hadn't closed this because [this example](https://reactjs.org/blog/2017/09/08/dom-attributes-in-react-16.html) ``` ``` still doesn't work. I intended to try to make a pull request before bringing this up, but I saw you just...

What do you think @paldepind ? I think this deserves attention, and @c-dante 's solution makes a lot of sense

Changing this section in `updateDeps(s)` ``` for (; orderNextIdx >= 0; --orderNextIdx) { o = order[orderNextIdx]; if (o.shouldUpdate === true) updateStream(o); o.queued = false; } ``` to this ``` for...

For side effects: clearly it could have great impact