Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

Results 19 comments of Iñigo Querejeta Azurmendi

I've published a [PR](https://github.com/RustCrypto/hashes/pull/256) for the implementation of the FSB hash function. Seems to work as expected compared to the [reference implementation](https://www.paris.inria.fr/secret/CBCrypto/index.php?pg=fsb). It still does not have the testing framework...

Thanks for the comments. You are right, I missed the correct link. Edited with the one of the gadget now 👍 Regarding the composer, my first thought would be that...

> Does `PseudoRandomFunction ` imply `CollisionResistantHashing`? Actually, it would be better to use `RandomOracle` instead of `PseudoRandomFunction`, as that might cause confusion given that the definition of a pseudo random...

After a discussion with @abailly-iohk , we thought that it would probably be of interest to keep `mithril-core` protocol agnostic. In the sense that we should not fit `mithril-core` to...

Yes, I was thinking about that. we are only missing computing the poolID from the cold key, but other than that, we have compatibility. I'm now trying to install the...

An efficiency improvement that would be easy to implement with balanced trees with unbalanced distributions, is that we could order the keys by its stake distribution (and not by the...

Seems that this error is different: ``` > cbindgen --version cbindgen 0.23.0 ``` and in the cargo file ``` [build-dependencies] cbindgen = "0.23.0" ``` Also ``` > cargo --version cargo...

Test case as in a little repo to reproduce the error? I've put the minimal failing example in this repo https://github.com/iquerejeta/cbindgen-test Thanks for looking into it!

@jedisct1 , does this mean that we are good to push this forward? If yes, I'll make a pass to make sure that the implemented version is what got finalised...

Got some trouble reproducing the `undefined reference to 'crypto_core_ed25519_scalar_negate'` and `undefined reference to 'crypto_core_ed25519_scalar_negate'` errors locally. I made sure I was configuring with the same call as the CI action:...