cluster-api-provider-proxmox icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cluster-api-provider-proxmox copied to clipboard

Cluster API Provider for Proxmox VE (CAPMOX)

Results 130 cluster-api-provider-proxmox issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

**Describe the solution you'd like** [A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.] The v1beta2 conditions is part of the status; we can use them instead of...

enhancement
kind/feature

**Describe the solution you'd like** A tool that would automatically convert v1alpha1 configs to v1alpha2. This is in addition to webhooks, tho some of the code could be shared.

enhancement
kind/feature

Version 0.7 of this provider is compatible with kubernetes 1.31. But it is also compatible with cluster api version 1.9, which itself supports kubernetes 1.32. So if I run 0.7...

> `.spec.Target` can be removed in new version, as it's not used anywhere, it's just messing around. If you want to deploy machines on specific Target you can use `.spec.AllowedNodes`...

api break

**Describe the solution you'd like** I would like to use disk images (qcow/img) instead of a VM-Templates inside the proxmoxmachine/template. **Anything else you would like to add:** With the Import...

enhancement
kind/feature

## Problem When using this provider on ARM64 systems (e.g., Orange Pi 5, Raspberry Pi with QEMU), VM creation fails due to the default Cloud-Init CD-ROM being attached to the...

**Describe the solution you'd like** I was migrating over from a Terraform/Ansible based setup where K3S was being used so I can go back to something more familiar in CAPI,...

enhancement
kind/feature

**Describe the solution you'd like** Ability to add extra disks to ProxmoxMachines and ProxmoxMachineTemplates beyond the `...spec.disks.bootVolume`. **Anything else you would like to add:** Currently can only attach a single...

enhancement
kind/feature

**Describe the solution you'd like** Its possible to use a GlobalInClusterIPPool/InClusterIPPool for Node-Network-Interfaces. It would be great if we could have the same functionally for the controlPlaneEndpoint field. **Anything else...

enhancement
kind/feature

**Describe the solution you'd like** Running govulncheck on PRs would help us avoid introducing known security issues. Running it on main would help us prevent creating releases with known security...

enhancement
kind/feature
github_actions