Zachary

What do we need to do in order to get this approved and merged?

Anyone know how to get attention on this issue?

For those still running into this, and are using self-hosted runners with a custom bringup script, here is a python snippet we use as part of a runner bring-up ```python...

@ericsciple this would be awesome to get added

Related/possible duplicate issues: https://github.com/actions/checkout/issues/955 https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/1676 (Where I believe this should actually be solved, as this is where the workspace-related code is - see https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/src/Runner.Worker/TrackingConfig.cs#L20) https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/118587

I have seen several issues opened around this and the related issue with runners, but no traction. How do we get visibility on these issues?

So, folks, is this actually a problem with `actions/checkout`? The underlying mechanics that causes this bizarre pathing issue is actually in https://github.com/actions/runner It is the one that generates the `_PipelineMapping///PipelineFolder.json`...

Related: https://github.com/actions/checkout/issues/197 Related: https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/1676 For 1676, I actually commented on it (and forgot) My bad...

> Looks good, and I working fine. > > Just a curious question: > > Why don't we consider all iterable, sequence instead of explicitly specifying each types? See https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/3913#discussion_r712343889...

> Assuming the original need was handled, this will be automatically closed now. But feel free to add more comments or create new issues or PRs. I think so. I...