insidewhy

Results 151 comments of insidewhy

@ocombe Ah so it does work with 1.5 then? The readme only lists as far as 1.4.

@ELLIOTTCABLE wow that's interesting.. I'm using this plugin because of Unity also and you're making me regret my choice of Unity even more (that and all the super basic bugs...

I'm working on an incremental cache for `ts-node` here: https://github.com/ohjames/ts-node/tree/jpike/cache It doesn't need to use the incremental API though. There's also an option to include `js` files in the cache...

This solution doesn't seem to work but I'm throwing it out there for now as I really need help fixing this. I'm just really not sure how useful rkt can...

This used to work until about 9 months ago. I've googled furiously and can only find people with the exact opposite problem (they want to bind only to `localhost` and...

I also tried using a bridged network with the following file at `/etc/rkt/10-scram.conf`: ``` { "cniVersion": "0.1.0", "name": "scram", "type": "bridge", "bridge": "cni0", "ipMasq": true, "isGateway": true, "ipam": { "type":...

I've found out why it is this way, the following two firewall rules: ``` Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RKT-PFWD-SNAT-43042192 all -- localhost.localdomain !localhost.localdomain CNI-f4e9851c1a6b272abc1d5136 all...

This is the commit that changed rkt's behaviour: https://github.com/rkt/rkt/commit/cd05e8b22b619ad214cf0c2cd4b2e48e447733af#diff-adb1d51f0a72db7676d3dcb3d42d010d Hm, this is looking like a bug where the bind address from the port forwarding specification isn't being respected.

*shrugs* The ports are only accessible from 127.0.0.1 without the additional less-restrictive `POSTROUTING` and `RKT-PFWD-SNAT-*` entries for whatever reason though.

As we've been unable to fix this my company has had to abandon rkt and re-adopt docker :(