winwiz1

Thanks for the feedback! > The issue with doing validation at this level is that it's all-or-nothing, and we would not want to block updating the entire output because a...

If you'd like to go ahead with integrating the utility, then its repository can be cloned/copied and the existing functionality can be used as is, I assume there is no...

The count in question 4,105,399 (+1,447) is taken from virusquery.com output: Date | Country | State/Province | Confirmed | Recovered | Active | Deaths |:---|:---|:---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:| 2021-02-19 | United Kingdom |...

@themonk911 Yes, this is what seems to be happening.

Can I suggest to replace in Public Health England API calls `cumCasesBySpecimenDate` with `cumCasesByPublishDate`. The former is highly volatile (an API call made later can and frequently will produce a...

As of now the page https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases shows: At the top: ``` People tested positive Total 4,126,150 ``` At the bottom: ``` Cases by area (whole pandemic) United Kingdom 4,126,150 ```...

>cumCasesByPublishDate is not available for L3 and Regions data Right, so there are issues with L3 and Regions as far as switching to `cumCasesByPublishDate` is concerned. I assume regions are...

> Blending data from multiple datasets is the core value-proposition of our project. Sure. However the value derived from a particular blending depends on factors like correctness and completeness of...

Related issue for epidemiology data: #186