Simon Hengel

This change makes sense. However, we currently don't produce binary distributions. So this is something we need to do to make this change meaningful.

@mpilgrem would you be ok to do a proof of concept before I make a final call? #### Things I would like to have answered ##### Dogfeed it on hpack...

Even with this questions answered I'm still 50-50. Hpack does not promote conventions. That's the reason why we e.g. don't default `source-dirs` to `src`. So the question is how far...

> Hpack does not promote conventions. I guess this should be added to the [design principles](https://github.com/sol/hpack?tab=readme-ov-file#design-principles). Something along the lines of "Hpack is universal. It does not promote any particular...

@istathar at the moment I don't have free cycles for this. If you want to help move this forward, this are the things we need: - [ ] double check...

My issue here is that at that point I would also set the convention on how a Haskell package should be structured. I'm very opinionated about this: - source files...

Thanks @mpilgrem.

Hi @brandon-leapyear 👋 thanks for reporting this! This is something we want to fix. I am away from my computer for the next couple of days. Still, I took a...

Doctest uses both, the GHC compilation pipeline and GHCi. - the GHC compilation pipeline is used for extracting Haddock comments - GHCi is used to evaluate examples If multiple home...

Thanks @mpickering 🙏 To summarize: 1. Doctest accepts arbitrary GHC arguments and uses these to: (a) initialize a GHC session and extract Haddock comments, and then (b) passes them to...