Rowan Manning

Hi José, yes I like this idea. It's definitely achievable, the API would have to change, but it's just a case of adding all the methods defined in `extendEvenMore` to...

Cool, thanks José, this seems to work. If you decide to open a pull-request, I'd be a little concerned with the repetition between `Class.extend` and `Class.reopen`, I'm sure we could...

Hi José, I'm busy for the next couple of days but I'll try to take a look at this later in the week. Thanks

Definitely possible, just a bit of a rewrite to the library. I'd probably do this as part of a 2.0 release (not planned at the moment, but maybe soon).

This is currently sitting on the [wip-extend-non-chic](https://github.com/rowanmanning/chic/tree/wip-extend-non-chic) branch. There's an unresolved issue: How to we ensure that the constructor code of the original function is called alongside extending class `init`...

I'd be happy to lend a hand if/when I can. Quite busy at the moment but should free up a little in the next couple of weeks (that's if my...

That's cool, @samhicks will make an awesome job of the design too :)

Hi @jbuck94, this is odd – Pa11y _should_ ignore warnings and notices as well as errors. I'll take a look for you

Actually looking at this again the ignored rule does not match the code of the error, which is why it's still appearing. It may be that you need to check...

Ah OK, looks like our list of rules is incomplete, we probably need an entry for each type of node.