Joel Holdbrooks

It appears the problems are with `down` and `up`. I resolved the problem by changing `down` to maintain the `:changed?` state of the path ``` diff (.children loc) (.make-node loc)...

@vikeri This library hasn't be updated in some time due to a few reasons. 1. I've fathered two children since the last commits. 2. I haven't had a need to...

I could be mistaken but this seems like the problem is further upstream, no? We only ask if something is `empty?` in one of the collection view components. Perhaps `goog.date.UtcDateTime`...

> As a side node, ankha skips stuff it doesn't understand or doesn't want to handle (e.g. functions) so I think this workaround does follow its spirit. The default behavior...

The `satisfies?` check returning `true` seems busted. I'm guessing the problem lies with the `object` implementation. Maybe what we could do is move [this code](https://github.com/noprompt/ankha/blob/master/src/ankha/core.cljs#L492-L493) to [here](https://github.com/noprompt/ankha/blob/master/src/ankha/core.cljs#L103) and handle the...

Hmm... I could have sworn this was an option but if it's not I'll gladly accept a patch. Otherwise you'll have to wait for me to get to it when...

Hmm... That seems like it's a bug because sets should be viewable.

I'm beginning to wonder if a protocol was the wrong choice for extensibility. A multimethod might have been a better choice. We could probably fix this issue by checking if...

Isn't that the behavior of `cljs.reader/read-string` though? Accepting only one form is reasonable. If someone needed to input more than one form I would assume they're working with a data...

While one of the uses of this library is to provide inspection into the data that drives an Om application that is _not_ the entirety of it's purpose. My vision...