Nat Noordanus

@kbhatiya999 I've created [this PR](https://github.com/nat-n/poethepoet/pull/81/files) that I think should fix the issue. I'm not sure if you can install a plugin directly into poetry from an arbitrary source, but I've...

Hi @Gobot1234, This is already achievable by declaring a sequence task then referencing it from the hook. For example ```toml [tool.poe.poetry_hooks] pre_build = "_pre_build" [tool.poe.tasks] _pre_build = ["add-cms", "fmt"] ```...

Hi @gangofnuns, thanks for the feedback. I've encountered similar issues with this myself, but haven't quite gotten to the bottom of it. What I know is that the following does...

Hi @smac89, thanks for the feedback! The CLI argument parser does not give any special meaning to `--`, it simple passes it to argparse like another argument. Now it appears...

Hi @lsorber, thanks for the feedback. By "unnecessary noise" do you just mean that poe invokes `poetry run` which slows down the process for no benefit? Or is there more...

Hi @lsorber, I played around a bit with this and came away unconvinced that the complexity of finding and reading the various config files was worth it. It's also quite...

This feature is available now as of [0.16.1](https://pypi.org/project/poethepoet/0.16.1/)

This is not currently supported. I considered it when first implementing this sequence task type. I thought it might be nice if by default an array inside an array would...

Also a potential if inelegant workaround might be to use a shell task with background jobs, like something along the lines of: ```toml [tool.poe.tasks.test] shell = """ poe mypy &...

Hi @jnoortheen, thanks for the idea. I understand that you're proposing the following strategy which I'll call **Strategy 1**: 1. let the first task in the list output directly to...