Mingzhi

> I have trained on caltech, but I can't reproduce the paper's number, my miss rate is 7.4% I have the same situation and I am working to find out...

@lw396285v Would you like to have a look at it? I have been working on this for about a month. I still have no progress. I have tried to use...

> If I don't use the training methods in the paper，and let the lr decay to 0.00002 after 50 epochs, the MR is around 5.5% what is the batchsize? did...

> BS==8 on caltech. image size is the same as in the paper. Can you share your train code please? It’s weird I am using bs=12 but achieved a worse...

> @msha096 Hi, what's your training config? the same as Keras's one.

I used the Caltech dataset for training. My method is not convenient, I use the matlab toolbox to transfer .vbb and .seq file to jpg and .txt/.csv first. (There are...

> > I used the Caltech dataset for training. My method is not convenient, I use the matlab toolbox to transfer .vbb and .seq file to jpg and .txt/.csv first....

>  > 这个结果和Repulsion loss一样都变差了，也是奇怪的很！希望作者贴出他的实验结果！ 您好，我最近也在跑这个代码，但是mAP只有3%-4%，试了SGD和其他的优化方法或者学习率的参数，可是每次epoch得到的mAP都为0。请问可以邮箱联系您吗？ 另外，这个论文的作者是针对中距离被遮挡的行人检测进行了提升，论文里给了MR-FPPI的参数。

> @qiuhaining ,@xrtbuaa ,请问一下你们跑得哪个数据集呢？我这面跑citypersons数据集，使用作者提供的test.py脚本跑到了mAP=0.5,然后使用citypersons官方给的脚本计算了一下log miss rate,大概27左右 请问下citypersons的官方脚本是把mAP和miss rate直接转换的吗？？

Can I know which data set you use？ Could you please offer the code to evaluate the MR-FPPI and output the bbox？ Thanks！