Sergio Marques
Sergio Marques
## Expected behavior The following [section](https://docs.forestadmin.com/documentation/how-tos/maintain/upgrade-notes-rails/upgrade-to-v7): > The signature of hooks functions has changed. In order to support the hooks for global and bulk smart action, record is no longer...
Hi, I've been trying to configure a Rails API 5.2 app with Knock (using Auth0) following the instructions and I got to a point that I was just getting a:...
## Expected behavior N/A ## Actual behavior N/A ## Failure Logs N/A ## Context **Currently the tests for the gem are run against a specific Ruby/Rails version, which makes it...
I would like to update some of my environment settings through the toolbelt.
@zzorba @Kamalisk Is it possible to introduce something similar to ArkhamDB to track the progression of a deck through a campaign by creating upgrades for it for each scenario completed?
I've had a look at the current API and it seems it has support for the FAQ but it requires a **card code** to be supplied. Would it be possible...
The idea behind this is to move towards an approach that avoids having code like this: ```ruby def call ... return agfs_reform_categories if agfs_reform? || Offence.in_scheme_ten.include?(claim.offence) default_categories end def default_categories...
We have quite a lot of specs that require checking for the JSON output of an API. [This RSpec helpers](https://relishapp.com/waterlink/rspec-json-expectations/docs/json-expectations) should help us asserting more accurately the format and content...
Ideally factories/traits would reflect valid data that we can rely on our tests. Currently we have setup a lot of factories just to fill in some specific spec needs (not...
## Expected behaviour In some of our **collection views** or **smart actions** we would like to present a URL link to a specific ForestAdmin page, that might not necessarily be...