Jonas Wagner

Hi Tom, I think adding additional code paths for 5D and 6D explicitly would probably be too specific. Adding a slower N dimensional variant would make more sense I think....

Hi Zach, sorry for the delayed reply. I'm not sure if it makes much sense to add this to this library. At least for most of my cases where I...

Hey @pspeter3 Thanks for the PR. What use case are you trying to cover with this?

@SReject Thanks for your input. > One suggestion I would make, is to capitalize the naming of the exported function. While not a constructor in nature it is a constructor...

Simplex-noise.js 4.0 has landed, and it removes the prng/alea completely. That seems like the cleanest option to me. But if there is demand I would also consider adding it back....

Hi @abernier , Thanks for your suggestion. I'm not quite sure I see the benefits outweighing the drawbacks of this extension. Here are the drawbacks I can see: As suggested...

Just to be clear, performance really isn't the be all end all of this discussion. Performance can be improved by writing stupid enough code for jit to understand: ```javascript function...

simplex-noise.js does not have a function specifically for 1D noise. You could use the 2D one just along one axis and fix the other one or derive one from the...

It's not hard to implement but simplex noise (as in the algorithm) is mostly useful in dimensions. For the 1D case you can just simply linearly interpolate. The main reason...

@finscn for now just use 2D while fixing 1 variable. It's not optimal performance wise but for the vast majority of 1d use cases it should do.