Joseph Schorr

@imacks Sounds great! Let us know if we can help in any way

@imacks Would you be willing to share your progress? I'm quite curious :)

@imacks Checking in again to see if you have anything you'd mind sharing :)

> There's also likely a thread to spin up around an optimization layer. How do we take a physical plan and transform it into something more efficient? That can likely...

@bradengroom Any updates on the stats side? Just curious :)

> Is there any progress on implementing this feature? Not currently. Still in the design phase.

Debug information will be moving into the check request/response itself shortly; once its there, you can read the trace to determine the missing caveat parameters

Reference: https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/1795 @croemmich Let us know if you need any additional information now that the check trace has been moved into the response

@kruegener Would you be willing to try modifying one of your Spanner indexes manually? The current index being used is defined as `CREATE INDEX ix_relation_tuple_by_subject ON relation_tuple (userset_object_id, userset_namespace, userset_relation,...

> That's a bit worrying! Its actually fairly expected, given how the transaction IDs are used. > Therefore falling back to the "fully consistent" snapshot ? They wouldn't apply at...