Joseph Schorr
Joseph Schorr
@winstaan74 Also, AuthZed's paid offering provides support for https://authzed.com/docs/spicedb-dedicated/fgam, which allows for very specific permissions on the tokens calling into SpiceDB Enterprise
@winstaan74 Let us know if the separate clusters doesn't work for some reason; if not, we can investigate exposing the readonly endpoint at its own endpoint via `serve`, perhaps with...
Related: https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/issues/497
@reify-tanner-stirrat Would you prefer a mixin style approach, ala: ``` mixin addsfoo { relation foo: bar } definition someresource { with addsfoo } ``` or would you just prefer definitions...
The problem with the above is now `sub_def_1` is *also* a valid type; that doesn't seem intentional?
Well, that's why I proposed having a `mixin` keyword; we could still have them compose using `...whatever` like you have in your example
> because I'd need a subschema composed entirely of mixins to be able to test a subsection of the scheme Not sure I follow... mixins won't impact testing. Tests will...
The test blocks are pulled in and run against the entire merged schema