Jan Küster

@sherryysj might be of interest to you: https://github.com/Meteor-Community-Packages/meteor-simple-schema/pull/741#issuecomment-1931972172

Hi @bruceborrett there is not types definition yet. Are you experienced with TypeScript? I am not yet so I need help to provide one. If you would consider adding one...

@bruceborrett ah I see now. The Simple Schema NPM package dropped Meteor support in their 3.x major release, which is [why this package is a hard-fork of the latest Meteor...

I come to the point to realize there is no way to support both sync and async computations. Since any method call will require async this bubbles down to all...

published `2.0.0-rc300.0` → compatibility with 3.0-rc.2

@vparpoil no, async validate etc. is a much bigger effort than expected. For now we will only cover Meteor 3.0 compatibility (in terms of versions / dependencies) and tackle full...

@StorytellerCZ let's discuss biome in the organization repo / discussions there

@aashutoshshr I got stuck by https://github.com/serut/meteor-coverage/pull/95 which blocks most of my conributions right now, since without decent coverage it's really time-consuming and stressful to migrate/refactor code.

@StorytellerCZ I released a 2.0.0 as of today. It's stable in what it does and resolved the correct 2x/3x versions dependencies. Regarding async compatibility: [we should make a vote](https://github.com/Meteor-Community-Packages/meteor-simple-schema/discussions/745)

@dr-dimitru does it make sense to continue this one, since Meteor3 upgrade is breaking anyway?