Iain Murray

Thanks for the reply, and confirming what was intended. I can believe some people forget that that the "conversion probability" *p* changes. It is strange in the context of marketing...

Thanks. I've relaxed the regex and fixed in 860a7b38. I'm afraid I'm not able to do 2-factor auth and wrangle the addon stores today. Will be published eventually in the...

Thanks. Will fix at some point, but honestly it will probably be a while before I get around to it. Adding new domains disables the whole extension until people accept...

Given #3, maybe I won't make the extension too powerful — at least not in the near future. Some configuration options might still be nice, but maybe not the core...

I think optional permissions could be used, so that users agree to allow access to more hosts when they enable rules. The list of rules is already quite unwieldy, such...

I've created a [manifest3](https://github.com/imurray/redirectify/tree/manifest3) branch that seems to work in Chrome (Chromium 89) with Manifest 3. I'm in no immediate rush to publish this version in the Chrome Web Store,...

You've specified tail behavior (what to do when outside the bins where the spline is defined) in the first case but not the second.

Ah, `MaskedPiecewiseCubicAutoregressiveTransform` is [hardecoded to use a `cubic_spline`](https://github.com/bayesiains/nflows/blob/ac0bf432fc7904458a933ed14180f0ac26e3f93d/nflows/transforms/autoregressive.py#L387) not an [`unconstrained_cubic_spline`](https://github.com/bayesiains/nflows/blob/ac0bf432fc7904458a933ed14180f0ac26e3f93d/nflows/transforms/splines/cubic.py#L15) that can deal with unconstrained inputs. In constrast, `MaskedPiecewiseRationalQuadraticAutoregressiveTransform` has code that [checks to see if there are tails...

The context should have shape `[context_size, context_features]`, containing the context for `context_size` different examples, where you specified `context_features` when creating the flow. `sample(num_samples, context)` then generates `num_samples` samples for each...

I assume the existing `...` parts in the comments are because we don't always assume the samples are necessarily a vector of length `features`, but could take other shapes. In...