Philip Jägenstedt

For https://github.com/whatwg/misc-server and https://github.com/whatwg/participate.whatwg.org there's also a bit of a wrinkle, namely that dependabot is enabled, and it won't be possible to have automatic merges or even saying `@dependabot merge`...

I've updated the table with the current state of things, after enabling branch protection to avoid accidental deletion and force pushing, but only adding "review required" where there was some...

> pressing the merge button is not significantly better or worse than adding a comment It's not clear from the comment if you know this, but in case not, the...

@annevk now that we're both back, do you have an update on what settings you'd like for repos that you're the editor for?

Sounds great! This should stay in the HTML workstream, right? It would be the first time a workstream holds more than one standard, but that's OK! > I propose using...

I mostly use Emacs which can re-wrap OKish, but it'll also wrap lines together with previous/following lines, so I end up spending time avoiding that by adding/removing blank lines. It's...

It does. For diffs, if it's a real mess, I always fall back to `git diff --word-diff -w` and for search, Emacs (and browsers) already searches across lines. That doesn't...

Looks like https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13559061/emacs-how-to-keep-the-indentation-level-of-a-very-long-wrapped-line would do the trick for Emacs, but if this isn't the default in most editors that people use (Sublime?) then it'll be a bit of a nuisance...

A tool that did the wrapping could avoid wrapping inside `` and `` and perhaps a few other places.

Yes, we should transplant that history onto whatever solution we end up with and then delete the branch. I'll add a step.