Jonathan Hall

> Yes, I agree. I was thinking that it would be convenient to have a method with a *js.Object receiver (like Call()), but I can do something similar in the...

> Another thing that would be really helpful: Is there an easy way to launch the tests of the Go standard library in the browser ? You can compile any...

> I also realize that there is a problem with empty slices which are apparently not converted as expected in JavaScript: This exemple outputs TypeError: Failed to execute 'digest' on...

Setting the language on a directory listing feels dirty to me. What if my filenames are in Italian? Or what if they are English, but my browser is in another...

@nevkontakte I think defaulting to `GOOS=linux` makes sense, as it's a clear improvement over the current state. If we determine that's not sufficient for some people, we can consider adding...

What is the intention in using a js tag in a struct that doesn't embed a `*js.Object` value?

AFAIK, it's required. Whether that means this issue is a bug or a feature, I don't know. I suppose I would expect a `js` tag with no associated `*js. Object`...

Thank you for submitting this issue. And my apologies that it has gone unacknowledge for so long. Are you still interested in working on this? Do you have any sense...

@dave We're looking at all old PRs, and see that this one is still outstanding. Unfortunately, the bug link in the original description has died. Are you able to either...

I was struggling with `btoa` and `atob` today, which is what prompted this issue. I guess I prematurely jumped to the conclusion that the builtin package was solving precisely the...