Dirkjan Ochtman

#9 did upgrade the dependency for the library, it just didn't get released.

You probably have a version mismatch between rustls and tokio-rustls versions.

(Make sure to also take care of the `LazyConfigAcceptor` when we tackle this.)

@dbgilley can you talk about your use cases in more detail? Would help us prioritize these features.

Thanks for the clarification. Would you be able to contribute some code towards this goal? We could probably provide some guidance on what needs to happen to make this work....

Maybe this is another case where we need to have enough public API/an extension point that allows people to build this on top of the more commonly used bits?

That's why I was wondering about an extension point for this, see https://github.com/rustls/rustls/issues/816#issuecomment-1711335363. In other words: I'm not sure there is appetite for a contribution that is specific to SPIFFE,...

> ## Questions > ### `rustls_cert_gen::Ca`? > > We could either keep it as a wrapper type of `rcgen::Issuer` or phase it out completely. > > If we were gonna...

Yeah, this API isn't great right now. I've described a plan to improve it in https://github.com/rustls/rcgen/pull/269#issuecomment-2079282218 -- if you want to help implementing that, that would be awesome. Unfortunately with...

Why doesn't the parsec tool update to rcgen 0.13? I don't know that we'd want to backport to 0.9.