David Figatner

Thanks for the report. I fixed it in 2.0.4. I was refactoring it recently, and ended up with two `Window.resize()` functions. It should work now.

Thanks for the feedback. Don't worry, you're not being a pest. I like my libraries to be usable as well :) I redid the build system, and forgot to include...

When I wrote this library, I ran into a bunch of problems with pixi's getBounds implementation. I ended up rolling a simpler version that, regrettably, assumes it shares a coordinate...

PIXI moved away from supporting PIXI.extras. Have you tried pixi-cull with `import` or `require()` instead? That's how I usually use it. If needed, i can go back and ensure it's...

The bundling system for pixi-cull is old. I need to redo it. I'll try to get it to it this week.

I updated the projected to v2.0.1. It is now accessible via the window.Cull variable. See the README.md for more information. Let me know if you run into any problems!

The sample code in docs/ works with the SpatialHash. The spatial hash does not place objects into pixi-containers (although that is certainly a way to implement it). I wanted more...

I was thinking more of this file: https://github.com/davidfig/pixi-cull/blob/master/docs/index.js, which is from the demo. But looking at it, it doesn't do much except call `spatialHash.addContainer()` Try: ``` const cull = new...

Yes, performance would be fine; it's what pixi already does (although they use matrices). An alternative is to use pixi's getBoundingBox(), which already includes rotations and skewing. My original version...

See https://github.com/davidfig/pixi-cull/issues/16. I need to redo the way pixi-cull is bundled. I'll try to get to it this week. It does work if using require or import.