Common Workflow Language project bot

Results 38 comments of Common Workflow Language project bot

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/too-many-arguments-on-the-command-line/248/31

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/how-to-create-a-uuid-inside-cwl/303/1

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/isolated-conda-environments-for-steps-in-cwltool/379/1

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/cwl-runner-and-podman/210/5

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/docker-error-invalid-mount-config-for-type-bind/598/1

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/cwl-with-python-and-python-pip-requirements/399/4

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/set-tool-output-format-string-from-workflow-inputs/524/4

This pull request has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/loop-requirement-implementation/611/4

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

This issue has been mentioned on **Common Workflow Language Discourse**. There might be relevant details there: https://cwl.discourse.group/t/potential-defect-in-ontology-format-checking/529/2