Cedric Beust

Sure, sounds useful!

Happy to accept a PR.

What's the point in this? This approach is less flexible than the current one since callers very often want to instantiate that object themselves so they can pass in additional...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, magnusvojbacke [email protected]: > What's the point in this? This approach is less flexible than the current > one since callers very often...

I understand that, but this API doesn't add any new functionality and can be emulated with a five line helper method...

What if you have multiple argument classes?

Hi @mkarg, No objection to the idea, but a bit concerned how big that PR would be. Happy to review it.

That's awesome to hear :)

Yes, I agree, lot of good ideas here. I'll go over it and think about how to improve the design of commands, let's keep this open.

Apologies for not acting on this PR but each time I pull it to review it, its size forces me to reschedule it for when I have more time ahead...