Benny Tordrup
Benny Tordrup
Do you have a time estimate on it?
I was the one reporting the issue that @dasetser just mentioned. I generate the reference for a service that contains a lot of classes, and it produces a 216000+ lines...
So it is a binding like the one below that is not possible to handle with CoreWCF and .NET5/6? ```xml ``` but a binding like this will work: ```xml ```...
So the CoreWCF is the server part? Or does System.ServiceModel.* packages also contain the ServiceHost part? Or do I completely misunderstand these things?
OK. So instead of putting ServiceHost class into CoreWCF, the way to go would be either to change our use of ServiceHost to ServiceHostBase or to implement a ServiceHost ourselves...
Created a pull request #81 to implement this
My pull request #81 has been merged. When will a new release of the package happen?
> One thing I might change is to force specifying the solution file even if its a single file. OK. So removing the `UseSingleSolutionFile` parameter and rely strictly on the...
The link, you refer to, does (as far as I can understand) not exclude that a **Primary key** cannot itself be a **Composite key** - in fact, I see this...
Is the same error here?  Reproduced with Visual Studio 2022 17.8.3, MSVC v143, Windows, benchmark v.1.8.2 (via vcpkg) or v1.8.3 from forked repo