Adam Tuttle

I don't recall why that was added. Seems to me if we're going to get rid of that clause, we can also ditch the `structKeyExists(local.beanInfo[local.beanName],'name')` clause that precedes it. Try...

Maybe we need a different/better fix for the issue described in #102, which solves that issue and this one.

Sounds good to me.

My first thought is along the same lines as `onTaffyRequest`, which they could override in Application.cfc to respond to the event. Either that or we'd have to require a new...

To be clear, `_body` is only intended to be passed as an argument when the input data is not recognizable or when it is something other than a MAP type...

Sorry for the year+ wait. If you're still interested in getting this change landed, I'd love to talk to you about it. I don't fully understand the motivation for this...

Based on the context of your question I'm pretty certain you don't mean server-side caching. There's no way to guarantee that the client will never cache the response; at least...

That sounds good to me. You volunteering to add it? 😇

I explained the steps here: https://adamtuttle.codes/blog/2014/your-first-github-pull-request/ But tl;dr: fork the repo, create a new branch forked from main, make your change in that branch, push it to your forked repo,...

No worries. Looks like you did fine. For reference, you might want to check this out: https://makeapullrequest.com/