Adam Tuttle

What about wrapping your include in ``? We should also be careful to support not having Taffy in the web root, because I am fairly certain it works even with...

Too much config is a bad thing. Part of what makes Taffy great is strict conventions that work well. If one way can serve all needs, just make it a...

Hi Dan. I'm hoping to put out a new version in the next couple of weeks/months. What's your status on this? You'll probably have some upstream commits that you need...

Ouch! Take care. :)

I've not used it, but since you're referencing `framework.aop` I assume this is actually AOP/1 instead of FW/1 or DI/1?

AOP is a feature/addon for dependency injection. Indeed, `aop.cfc` extends DI/1: https://github.com/framework-one/aop1/blob/bdc7b916a818bd2731c8d51122fe09f098258bba/aop.cfc#L1 Taffy supports [using DI/1 as its bean factory](https://github.com/atuttle/Taffy/wiki/So-you-want-to:-use-an-external-bean-factory-like-coldspring-to-completely-manage-resources) but I've never tried it with AOP/1, which _should_ work...

I've got the tests _running_ (not _passing_) on actions: https://github.com/atuttle/Taffy/actions Currently they only run for the branch `feature/github-actions`, so that we can get them all working before merging the change...

Well, after struggling with the existing stuff I decided to move it off to the side and start fresh. I got a set of testbox tests running that runs and...

Appreciate the examples. Right now I'm just focusing on getting the tests working again. Then I'll worry about test matrices/etc. :)

@ryanguill please keep this in mind if you do decide to tackle the router rewrite we discussed.