Anna Henningsen

@ETHproductions no, but `node ./node_modules/coveralls/bin/coveralls.js < ./coverage/lcov.info` would be virtually equivalent to `cat ./coverage/lcov.info | ./node_modules/coveralls/bin/coveralls.js`.

Oh, hi everyone! I think for iltorb to be used here requires adding a `.flush()` method like zlib streams have it (MayhemYDG/iltorb#8), although that should have become implementable; in fact,...

As I understand it, one main difference is that napajs goes much further than what’s currently built into Node.js – you can actually share and transfer JavaScript objects between the...

@davegermiquet I’m not an expert on yarn, but does using npm or updating yarn help? At least npm ships with its own copy of node-gyp.

@davegermiquet I would be relatively sure that it’s the former.

You’ll want `useAtomics: false` if you plan to communicate with the worker thread externally, instead of using piscina’s built-in communication mechanism. It’s going to be a bit slower in that...

I’m worried that this would create a lot of noise… most bug reports we get aren’t platform-specific, so it might be best to not just ping people because they filled...

Oh, I see. I assume that is/was because we do the rebasing before actually running test? I don’t know, but if I look at things like https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/14072/ then the `(commit:...

@elliot-nelson This is https://github.com/istanbuljs/test-exclude/issues/43, potentially being fixed by https://github.com/istanbuljs/test-exclude/pull/44

@elliot-nelson I think it’s also about the comment I just left on the fix about using `path.resolve()` instead of `path.join()` :)